Image of the Judicial Council of California Seal

2022 California Rules of Court

Standard 5.30. Family court matters

(a) Judicial assignments to family court

In a court with a divide family courtroom, the presiding judge of the superior court should assign judges to the family unit court to serve for a minimum of three years. In selecting judges for family unit court assignments, the presiding approximate should consider, in add-on to dominion x.603(c)(1)(A) of the California Rules of Court, the approximate'due south prior experience in family law litigation and mediation, too every bit whether the judge prefers to serve in a family police section.

(b) Example assignment to aforementioned department

To the extent possible, family police force deportment related to the aforementioned family unit should be assigned to the aforementioned judicial officeholder for all purposes, so that all decisions that are fabricated in a case through final judgment are issued by the same judicial officer.

(c) Importance of family courtroom

The supervising estimate in the family unit courtroom, in consultation with the presiding guess of the superior court, should:

(one)  Motivate and educate other judges regarding the significance of family court; and

(2)  Work to ensure that sufficient judicial officers, court staff, family law facilitators, child custody mediators and evaluators, interpreters, financial resource, and adequate facilities are assigned to the family court to allow acceptable time to hear and decide the matters before it.

(d) Bounty for courtroom-appointed attorneys

The supervising gauge of the family court should ensure that court-appointed attorneys in the family unit court are compensated at a level equivalent to attorneys appointed past the courtroom in comparable types of cases.

(due east) Training and education

Family court law is a specialized area of the police that requires dedication and report. The supervising judge of the family unit courtroom has a responsibleness to maintain high-quality services in family court. The quality of services provided by judicial officers and court staff depends, in significant part, on appropriate grooming and instruction, from the kickoff of the family unit court assignment and on a continuing basis thereafter.

(1)  Family court judicial officers, family unit law facilitators, kid custody mediators and evaluators, interpreters, other court staff, and court-appointed attorneys should have sufficient grooming to perform their jobs competently.

(2)  The supervising judge of the family court should promote access to printed, electronic, Cyberspace, and other family constabulary resource.

(f) Unique function of a family unit court

Nether the direction of the presiding guess of the superior courtroom, the family courtroom, to the extent that information technology does non interfere with the adjudication procedure or violate any ethical constraints, is encouraged to:

(1)  Provide active leadership within the community in determining the needs of, and obtaining and developing resources and services for children and families who participate in the family unit law courtroom system;

(ii)  Investigate and determine the availability of specific prevention, intervention, and treatment services in the community for families who come before the family courts;

(3)  Take an active role in helping the courtroom develop rules and procedures that will issue in the ordering of appropriate handling and services for children and families;

(4)  Practise a leadership role in the development and maintenance of services for self-represented and financially disadvantaged litigants;

(v)  Accept an agile part in the formation of a community-wide network to promote and coordinate private- and public-sector efforts to focus attention and resource on the needs of family law litigants;

(6)  Educate the community and its institutions, including the media, apropos the part of the family court in coming together the complex needs of families;

(7)  Encourage the development of customs services and resource to assist families and children in the family court system, including self-help information; supervised visitation; substance abuse and drug prevention, intervention, and treatment; services for families with domestic violence issues; counseling; parenting teaching; vocational grooming; arbitration; culling dispute resolution options; and other resources to back up families;

(8)  Manage cases more efficiently and effectively to avoid alien orders;

(9)  Take an agile part in promoting completion of cases in a timely manner;

(10)  Appoint counsel for children in advisable family constabulary custody cases; and

(xi)  Ensure that the best interest of children is served throughout the family court process.

(m) Appointment of attorneys and other persons

A court should follow the guidelines of standard 10.21 of the California Standards of Judicial Assistants when appointing attorneys, arbitrators, mediators, referees, masters, receivers, and other persons.

Standard 5.30 adopted constructive Jan 1, 2007.

Standard five.30. Family court matters include proceedings under the Family Code for dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, legal separation, custody and support of pocket-sized children; or deportment under the Domestic Violence Prevention Human action, the Compatible Parentage Human action, the Uniform Kid Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act, Domestic Partner Registration Act, and the Compatible Interstate Family Support Act; local child back up bureau actions under the Family Code; and contempt proceedings relating to family law or local child support agency actions.

Subdivision (a). This subdivision implements the legislative mandate of Family Lawmaking section 2330.3(b) requiring the Judicial Quango to adopt a standard of judicial administration prescribing a minimum length of a estimate'south family law consignment. Standard 5.30 sets a standard in family court that is like to the juvenile court standards stated in standard 5.xl, Juvenile Court Matters.

Family law is circuitous and constantly evolving. The laws concerning child custody, support, domestic violence, and belongings division are always changing. Not but does the family police estimate have to understand family police and procedure merely likewise issues that involve bankruptcy, estate planning, insurance, country and federal taxation law, business, immigration, and criminal law, which tin oft ascend in the context of a family law example. Because of the complication and long-range affect of the judicial determinations, the presiding judge should strive to place experienced judges in family law assignments.

Considering the constantly evolving changes in the constabulary, besides as the unique nature of the proceedings in family courtroom, the family court gauge should be willing to commit to a minimum tenure of three years. Not only does this tenure beget the estimate the opportunity to become well acquainted with the complexity of the family court process, but it also provides continuity to a arrangement that demands it.

Subdivision (b) This subdivision implements the legislative mandate of Family Lawmaking section 2330.3(a), which requires that dissolution deportment, to the greatest extent possible, be assigned to the same superior court department for all purposes, and so that all decisions in a case are fabricated past the same judicial officer. This subdivision expands the Legislature's requirement past including other related family court matters, such as those filed under the Uniform Parentage Human activity, Domestic Violence Prevention Act, in recognition that the same families may enter the family courtroom through a multifariousness of deportment.

The commission recognizes that having the aforementioned judicial officeholder hear all actions involving the same family unit may non be practical in all cases for reasons that include funding limitations, assignment rotations, affliction, vacations, and retirements. In some courts, one judge does not hear all aspects of a family'due south legal problems because of multiple courthouse locations or specifically designated funding of certain issues (e.g., Title 4-D child support issues). Notwithstanding, the commission agrees with the legislative intent in enacting department 2330.3(a), which was to expedite and simplify the dissolution process, reduce the litigation expenses and costs, and encourage greater judicial supervision of cases involving dissolution of marriage. Family law actions frequently involve a succession of hearings to resolve the various bug that ascend. A unmarried judge's involvement over this menses of time allows the judge to be more familiar with the particular actions and issues, which creates judicial efficiencies that expedite their handling. One judge hearing all actions involving a family unit likewise helps avoid alien orders, alleviates the demand to agree multiple hearings on the aforementioned upshot, improves the court process, promotes consistency, and enhances fairness in family proceedings.

Subdivision (c). The family court is an integral part of the justice system. Decisions made by family law judges can have significant and lasting impacts on the lives of the parties and their children. The work of the family court has a meaning affect on the health of families and ultimately on the strength of the customs. The parties deserve to have acceptable fourth dimension to present their cases, and the judges should have the resources they need to enable them to make informed decisions. Information technology is only through the abiding exertion of pressure to maintain resource and the continuous education of court-related personnel and administrators that the historic trend to give less priority and provide fewer resources to the family unit court can exist inverse.

Subdivision (d). Fees paid to court-appointed attorneys who represent children in family courtroom are sometimes less than the fees paid attorneys doing other comparable legal work thereby demeaning the work of the family courtroom and leading many to believe that such piece of work is less important. It may also discourage attorneys from accepting these appointments. Compensation for legal piece of work in the family court should reflect the importance of the work.

Subdivision (e)(2). A significant bulwark to having well-trained attorneys and educated self-represented litigants is a lack of electric current educational materials relating to family courtroom exercise. Police libraries, law offices, and court systems traditionally have not devoted adequate resources to purchase such educational materials. With advances in engineering, resources can exist accessed, shared, adult, or made available through electronic/estimator-based, online, and multimedia means, audiotape and videotape, DVD, CD, Web-based audiocasts and videocasts, and other media to supplement impress materials.

Subdivision (f). In addition to the traditional role of adequately and efficiently resolving disputes before the courtroom, a family courtroom judge occupies a unique position within California's judiciary. California law empowers the family courtroom judge not merely to order relief related to the needs of families under its jurisdiction only likewise to enforce and review the compliance with such orders. This oversight role includes the obligation to understand and piece of work with those public and private agencies that provide services for families. As such, the family courtroom assignment requires a dramatic shift in emphasis from judging in the traditional sense. Active and public judicial back up and encouragement of programs serving children and families in family unit court poses no conflict with traditional concepts of judicial ideals and is an important office of the family court judge. These efforts heighten the overall administration of justice for families.

2

[ Back to Top ]